Preparation of AIR report

[soniya55531]

According to the guide released by SEPEC, based on the guidelines of the AIR Decree, the report structure must contain:


executive Summary;

identification of the regulatory problem to be solved;

identification of economic agents, users of services provided and others affected by the regulatory problem identified;

identification of the legal basis that supports the action of the body or entity on the subject in question;

definition of the objectives to be achieved;

description of possible alternatives for addressing the identified bahamas mobile database regulatory problem, considering the option of no action, in addition to normative solutions, and, whenever possible, non-normative options;

presentation of the possible impacts of the identified alternatives;

considerations regarding the information and statements received by the AIR in possible social participation processes;

mapping of international experience regarding the measures adopted to resolve the identified regulatory problem;

identification and definition of the effects and risks arising from the publication, alteration or revocation of the normative act;

comparison of the alternatives considered, indicating, with justification, the alternative or combination of them that is most suitable for achieving the intended objectives;

description of the strategy for implementing the suggested alternative, including forms of monitoring and inspection, as well as the need to change or revoke current standards.



The document also defines that the content of the AIR report must be detailed and complemented with additional elements specific to the specific case, according to its degree of complexity, scope and repercussion of the matter under analysis.


AIR and Relgov
In view of the latest measures adopted and their importance in maintaining competitiveness and fostering Brazil's development, Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) has stood out as a fundamental instrument for carrying out technical analyses that seek to support decisions regarding the review of regulatory standards.


In this sense, considering the scenario of the Institutional and Governmental Relations area, the use of monitoring tools becomes essential to the performance, since the main function of AIR is to guide decision-making. In other words, there is a direct impact on Relgov, considering the relevance of regulatory monitoring both for ensuring that companies comply with the legislation and standards established for the regulated sectors in which they operate, and for remaining competitive in the market.


Seeking to improve regulatory quality and based on evidence and identification of aspects that need improvement, RIA represents an opportunity for the RIG area. In addition to mitigating possible negative effects on the organization and reducing risks , the transparency of processes enables the design of more accurate strategies when it comes to defending interests, as well as the creation of yet another governance tool to guide decision-making.