These limitations are as follows

[sumona]

Additionally, INP will replace the FID (First Input Delay) metric going forward.

As a result, FID will be deprecated and will no longer be part of Core Web Vitals.

This also means that you will no longer see FID scores in your Google Search Console dashboard once this new metric goes live.

Google will still retain historically important FID documentation, at least for now.

Why is INP better than FID?
So why did Google replace FID? And how is INP better?

According to Google itself, First Input Delay has certain limitations when it comes to measuring a page's response speed.



As the name suggests, FID only measures responsiveness the first time a gambling database korea website visitor interacts with the page, i.e. first input.
FID measures the time the browser had to wait before handling the interaction, i.e. latency.

INP is different from FID in that it measures the entire scope of interactions on a page instead of just the first input.

This new metric measures the interaction with the longest delay on a page, or in other words, the interaction that takes the longest to load before visitors see a visual change.

“These implementation details make INP a much more comprehensive measure of user-perceived responsiveness than FID.”